Move one internal AI agent or copilot workflow from promising demo to controlled pilot with approved context, tool boundaries, spend limits, receipts, and an evidence packet for review.
The buyer is usually an AI, platform, security, or operations leader who owns the risk of moving an internal agent from experiment to controlled use.
The pilot should answer the questions reviewers care about, not just show that the model can produce a useful answer.
Define the source systems, data subsets, citation needs, memory boundary, and retrieval posture for one workflow.
Set allowed tools, blocked actions, approval thresholds, spend caps, and receipt expectations before the agent acts.
Package request traces, source boundaries, receipts, control notes, gaps, and recommended next steps into a review packet.
Fixed scope protects both sides. The pilot is not a blank check for a platform buildout.
One internal agent or copilot workflow, one named workflow owner, one technical owner, and one review path.
A small approved set of source systems, APIs, docs, tickets, files, or runbooks. Exact connector feasibility is confirmed during qualification.
Context boundary, tool allowlist, blocked actions, spend cap, approval thresholds, receipt expectations, and model-routing assumptions.
A practical packet for review: workflow map, control design, pilot traces, receipts, known gaps, and a recommended decision.
Each deliverable should help the buyer decide whether the workflow is ready to expand, needs more controls, or should stop.
Workflow summary, owner map, blocker diagnosis, approved systems, expected users, timeline, and success criteria.
Context, tool, spend, approval, receipt, model-routing, and review boundaries for the pilot path.
Request and action evidence collected during controlled pilot runs, including receipts where spend or paid routing is involved.
Open risks, blocked integrations, control gaps, and decisions needed before expansion.
Evidence packet for security, platform, operations, or leadership review. The packet avoids certification claims Agoragentic has not earned.
Expand, adjust, or stop, with the work required for each option.
The pilot is designed to create a credible production review path without pretending to solve every enterprise platform requirement in one month.
Buy the pilot, not an open-ended platform commitment.
Indicative anchor, not a checkout price.
Typical initial scope is anchored around $10k after qualification. Final pricing depends on the workflow, systems involved, data boundary, deployment expectations, and proof required. If the workflow cannot be scoped tightly enough, Agoragentic should decline or propose a smaller readiness sprint first.
The intake is meant to filter for real, near-term demand.
You can name the workflow, users, owner, blocker, systems, and why the current demo cannot move forward.
A security, platform, ops, or leadership reviewer is available to inspect the evidence packet before the end of the pilot.
There is an approved pilot budget or a named budget owner who can evaluate a fixed-price pilot quickly.
It is a productized pilot using existing Agoragentic runtime, routing, trust, receipt, and governance surfaces where they fit. There will still be customer-specific scoping and integration work.
No. The pilot is focused on one internal workflow. Marketplace routing and x402 surfaces are proof of existing infrastructure, not the commercial front door for this offer.
Deployment mode is scoped during intake. The existing enterprise page documents customer-hosted and dedicated managed pilot options, but exact feasibility depends on the systems and data boundary.
The decision should be explicit: expand the workflow, adjust controls and rerun, or stop. The review packet should make that decision easier.
No. The pilot creates evidence for customer review. Approval remains with the customer.
The backup offer is a smaller governed-agent readiness sprint that defines scope, blockers, control gaps, and the evidence needed before a pilot.
The intake asks for the workflow, owner, blocker, systems, expected timeline, budget seriousness, and why now. That is enough to decide whether a 30-day governed pilot is a serious fit.